Orcworm.co.uk
WWIII - Printable Version

+- Orcworm.co.uk (http://orcworm.co.uk)
+-- Forum: General Discussion (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Off-topic (/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Thread: WWIII (/showthread.php?tid=2621)



WWIII - musiciscool - 09-03-2013 11:09 PM

Since the forums are dead I figured this might capture a little attention.
http://www.lewrockwell.com/2013/08/michael-snyder/22-reasons-why-starting-ww3-in-syria/
Yep, the US is about to start WWIII. Despite the fact that almost all of us don't want to fuck with Syria, the gubment is about to bomb the shit out of syria. Then syria will attack us and israel, + iran is gonna get on our ass because syria is their #1 buttbuddy. Not to mention that even if we do somehow survive the shitstorm that's brewing, all of our relationships will be damaged.

What are your ideas on this?


RE: WWIII - Invaders0 - 09-04-2013 02:33 AM

First off: What the fuck is with your autistic grade avatar
Secondly: I thought the same thing when I heard about this, but I have serious doubts it will lead to a WWIII-esque scenario.


RE: WWIII - bubba_rocks - 09-04-2013 03:01 AM

....Yay Canada!


RE: WWIII - patrickfreed - 09-04-2013 11:55 PM

Sensationalist bullshit.

At the moment Congress is delegating so nothing is currently scheduled to happen.
At WORST, the US will send a bunch of drones or task forces in, which really isnt anything close to a war, much less a world war. I'm not sure if you've taken basic history but those were caused by the assassination of an archduke and the near takeover of the entirety of Europe. Not some isolated bombing in a 3rd world country.

Also if you want to have a legitimate discussion, don't start off with some random guy's blog post.


RE: WWIII - DoughnutSpanker - 09-05-2013 01:41 AM

If the US strikes, we will have WWIII, however, it could be worse than you think.
With Russia backing Syria, we'll be at war with Russia, or at least probably a cold war.

NOBODY GOT TIME FO DAT


RE: WWIII - Invaders0 - 09-05-2013 01:44 AM

(09-05-2013 01:41 AM)DoughnutSpanker Wrote:  If the US strikes, we will have WWIII, however, it could be worse than you think.
With Russia backing Syria, we'll be at war with Russia, or at least probably a cold war.

NOBODY GOT TIME FO DAT
NO
PLEASE DON'T ATOMIZE ME
AUUUUGH


RE: WWIII - LuminousMouse - 09-05-2013 05:29 AM

(09-05-2013 01:41 AM)DoughnutSpanker Wrote:  If the US strikes, we will have WWIII, however, it could be worse than you think.
With Russia backing Syria, we'll be at war with Russia, or at least probably a cold war.

NOBODY GOT TIME FO DAT

Beat me to it. GG.


RE: WWIII - lolyounoob1 - 09-08-2013 02:33 AM

As usual the US must police the world as it see's fit. My bigger worry is the added cost to our substantial debt will cause political problems to arise sooner since we are already approaching the current debt limit (expected to be hit mid October without a war). I don't want the US to be dragged into another costly regime change....like Iraq. We may say our intentions are not a regime change, but if we bomb Syria and then give rebels extensive weapons....that is what will happen.


RE: WWIII - Formans - 04-14-2017 05:32 AM

(09-05-2013 01:41 AM)DoughnutSpanker Wrote:  If the US strikes, we will have WWIII, however, it could be worse than you think.
With Russia backing Syria, we'll be at war with Russia, or at least probably a cold war.

NOBODY GOT TIME FO DAT

It's almost like you predicted the future.